The three outcomes
| Outcome | What it means |
|---|---|
| Handled by Cevro | Cevro took the ticket and worked it — resolving it, or escalating it to your team after engaging. |
| Bypassed by a rule | An automation rule you set up sent the ticket straight to your team, so Cevro never engaged. |
| Routed to your team | The ticket was for a brand or area Cevro isn’t set up to handle, so it went straight to your team. |
What the cards show
- % Tickets to Cevro — of all incoming tickets, the share Cevro handled. The count here is the same number as the “AI-handled tickets” total on the % Tickets Resolved and % Tickets Escalated cards — so the figures line up across your dashboard. A low number usually means most of your brands or areas aren’t automated yet, not that Cevro is underperforming.
- % Bypassed by Rule — of the tickets that reached Cevro (handled plus bypassed), the share an automation rule sent straight to your team. Tickets for non-automated brands aren’t counted here: a rule never had the chance to act on them, so including them would make the rule look like it fires far less often than it really does.
Depending on how your support channel is set up, these cards may be phrased in terms of conversations rather than tickets — the meaning is the same.
Reading them together
- High ”% to Cevro” → most of your incoming traffic is reaching the AI, as intended. A low number points to brands or areas that aren’t automated yet.
- High ”% Bypassed by Rule” → of the tickets that did reach Cevro, your own rules are holding a large share back — worth a look if you’d expect Cevro to handle them.
- The third outcome — tickets routed to your team because Cevro isn’t set up for that brand or area — has no card of its own. It’s the gap between % to Cevro and 100%.
Related
- Understanding the metrics — the full analytics page, metric by metric
- Measuring success — the key metrics and how to improve them